or most of
us, crummy weather can kill a summer weekend. But Richard Arms, the well-known
market technician, had a recent weekend ruined by his comparative study
of the three charts displayed below. They show how the famous bull markets
of the 1920s and 1980s both peaked in the summer, in 1929 and 1987, to be
exact, and how those bull runs ended shortly thereafter in infamous crashes.
And that's why the bottom chart, depicting the Dow's majestic rise since
1994, gives Arms the chills.
The charts bear shocking similarities, ``not just in the major moves
but in the minor blips,'' Arms told us last week from his perch in New
Mexico. At the least, they suggest, he says, that Mark Twain was onto something
when he observed that while history may not repeat itself, it does rhyme.
``Essentially the market doubled in each time period, going from about
150 to 350 in the 1920s, 1200 to 2800 in the 1980s, and 4000 to 8000 in
the past two years,'' Arms points out.
Besides tracing the Dow's movements, Arms charted weekly volume for
each of the three bull markets, observing in all cases that light volume
in the early stages grew progressively heavier as the market climbed. ``If
history repeats, we are within weeks of a major market top,'' he concludes.
``The charts are implying that the party is very nearly over.''
Today's bull market bears an eerie resemblance to two
of its predecessors, both of which met miserable ends. According to market
technician Richard Arms, we will soon see warning signs among their explosive
trading volume and a series of sharp drops and rebounds.
Ever the technician, Arms will not venture a guess as to why, or how,
today's bull will meet his sad demise. But Arms is quick to point out that
the aging beast himself will offer numerous clues that the end is nigh.
First and foremost, look for day upon day of ``extremely heavy'' volume,
accompanied by ``lack of progress'' to the upside. ``The market just runs
into a wall,'' he says.
Volume on the New York Stock Exchange indeed has been rising in the
past few years, as it did in the 1920s and in the years preceding the '87
top. ``A few years ago we were trading 300 million shares a day,'' Arms
observes. ``In June, average daily volume was 520 million shares, compared
with 482 million shares in May, and 476 million shares in April. Before
it's over, I would expect to see unprecedented volume, with perhaps 700
million-800 million share days.'' Last week, Big Board volume exceeded
600 million shares in several sessions.
Another telltale sign of a market top is a series of ``preliminary''
sharp drops and rebounds, Arms says. Wrenching moves haven't become commonplace
- at least, not yet - although the Dow's near 200-point decline June 23,
and its 120-point drop in July's first full week, conceivably could be
early warnings. By the same token, the Nasdaq's explosive rally in recent
days also hints of potential trouble. In Arms's view, it suggests a pickup
in speculative fever: ``Investors are moving away from the tried-and-true
Dow stocks, and into things from which they might get better performance.
But they are taking more risks to do so.''
To be sure, Arms is not the first to notice the eerie parallels between
the 1920s, 1980s and 1990s. Folks who brush off the implications can take
comfort from the fact that the economic backdrop today is markedly different,
particularly in comparison with the 1985-87 period. A decade ago, the economy
was in overdrive; inflation and interest rates were rising, and the dollar
was falling. Today's economic expansion is a much more balanced affair,
with inflation nearly mute. ``I get the fundamentals quoted to me all the
time, but I really don't look at them,'' says Arms. ``Everything that is
known about the market is in the price of the stocks. When the fundamentals
change, the market already will be reacting to them.''
Arms, who has been cautious about stocks for a while, only recently
turned more bearish. Of his little chart experiment, he says, ``Human emotions
remain the same, and the market gets pushed up in the same rhythmic manner.''
If Richard Arms, and perhaps Mark Twain, are right, this market could
topple in the same way, too.
|