For the past several years I have been attempting to present information to the scientific community about longwave phenomenon, astroharmonics and the possibility of a Grand Supercycle crash that will involve an outbreak of global war.
In doing so, I have met derision, outright insults and have been, for the most part, completely ignored. Now, however, the response is becoming even more close-minded and irrational.
Several weeks ago I joined a listserver for discussing longwave phenomenon. After posting several articles about astroharmonic evidence related to longwave phenomenon to this list, a number of self-proclaimed "scientists" started to complain that the material I was presenting was "inappropriate" for longwave discussions. Thus, I engaging in a lengthy debate on "Elliott Waves, astroharmonics and scientific reasoning" (this discussion is archived at-
*UPDATE 3/28*: The debate is no longer archived there because my posts were explicitly removed. Truly these guys are going to great lengths to censor the truth.
http://csf.colorado.edu/longwave/
which can be accessed from the "Astroharmony" page on my *Spirit Of Truth* WWW site; note that sometimes you have to click a couple of times on the discussion posts for them to come up). In the context of this discussion I confronted those individuals who wanted to *dictate* what is and is not "appropriate" for scientific inquiry. The response was predictable. I was removed from the list.
For your perusal, below is my notification that I have been removed from the longwave list along with my original post on "Elliott Waves, astroharmonics & scientific reasoning" and my final post on the list before being removed.
===================================================================== Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 13:25:55 -0500 To: JPA94001@UConnVM.UConn.Edu From: dassbach@mtu.edu (Carl H.A. Dassbach) Subject: Re: Global Bipolar Disorder I asked you to refrain from posting unsubstantiated, wildly speculative material but you have not heeded my request. I have received a number of complaints from others about your postings and I suspect that you posting are also partially responsible for the recent wave of unsubs. You leave me no other choice but to remove you from this list. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Carl H.A. Dassbach E-mail: DASSBACH@MTU.EDU Dept. of Social Sciences Phone: (906)487-2115 Michigan Technological University Fax: (906)487-2468 Houghton, MI 49931 USA ========================================================================= Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:36:04 -0500 To: JPA94001@uconnvm.uconn.edu From: dassbach@mtu.edu (Carl H.A. Dassbach) Subject: Stop posting messages I have asked you to stop posting messages. You refused. I unsubscribed you from the list but now I find more of your astro babble. Stop sending messages to LW-L. Can't you get the message, they are disruptive, irrelevant and NO ONE IS INTERESTED. Carl Dassbach ----------------------------------------------------------------- Carl H.A. Dassbach E-mail: DASSBACH@MTU.EDU Dept. of Social Sciences Phone: (906)487-2115 Michigan Technological University Fax: (906)487-2468 Houghton, MI 49931 USA ======================================================================= Date: Mon, 15 Jan 96 00:56:02 EST From: "J. Adams"Subject: Long-waves, astroharmonics & scientific reasoning To: Longwave List Dear longwave list members, I recently received a request from an individual on this list to no longer post articles, evidence, etc. as I have been that present a case for an astroharmonic explanation of long-wave phenomenon. Since I feel that this request, if met, would constitute a violation of academic freedom, I feel it is necessary to make a public debate out of the issue. Thus, below is the e-mail I received as well as my response. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >From: "James DeW. Perry" >To: '*Spirit Of Truth* WWW Page' >Subject: RE: Moscow Coup? (fwd) >Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 09:59:13 -0500 >There is absolutely no shred of empirical evidence to support any of >the many versions of astrology. Your attempt to claim otherwise, by = >referring to the attached post, is laughable. What strikes me as laughable is sweeping, unsupported claims like above. How do you know there is no evidence in support of "any of the many versions of astrology"? Have you ever taken a look for yourself? Or do you simply *have faith* that others have determined this for you already. If so, who? References? Facts? Results? At least with the attached post I'm presenting a case based upon evidence. You are simply making unsupported claims. This is a disservice to discovering the truth of the situation. >It is "popularly presumed" that astrology is meaningless because it was >developed from superstitutions, and there has never been any success in >trying to support its hypotheses by real-world tests. Indeed. Your view that "astrology is meaningless because it was developed from superstitions" is the misleading popular presumption, particularly in science, to which I referred. That a common belief system would emerge across numerous different and separate cultures, from the Babylonians to the Mayans, over eons of history suggests that *superstitions" arose and astrological beliefs developed because these ancient cultures were picking-up on regularities of social change which had been observed over thousands of years. The brief experience with history available for study by Western civilization likely means we have not had a chance to discover what these ancient cultures did- at least not until now. What's more, Western science suffers from a self-deluding arrogance that prevents it from dealing with the insights of "primitive" cultures of past times regardless of whether or not these insights were and are based upon empirical fact. As for your claim that "there has never been any success in trying to support its hypotheses by real-world tests", this is simply wrong. I would suggest you check out E. Dewey's 4 volume set "Cycles Classic Library Collection" to start. E. Dewey, the founder of the "Foundation for the Study of *Cycles*", compiled extensive evidence in support of a connection between astroharmonics, sunspot cycles and socioeconomic cycles like the long-wave. If you would like to see a more concrete example of how astroharmonics influence market/price cycles, I would suggest you check-out the record of Greg Meadors' stock market trading system which is based upon W.D. Gann's astroharmonic model of stock market behavior (Meadors has a web site at the URL- http://ison.com/mktsys). His success can be back-tested for statistical corroboration of a connection between astroharmonics and wave patterns in stock prices. Furthermore, similar statistically significant success has been achieved based upon Chris Carolan's "Spiral Calendar" trading system in stock, bond and commodity markets. This trading system makes use of Fibonacci relationships (do you know what those even are?) and lunar cycles (Carolan is based at Elliott Wave International- phone #: (800) 636-1618). Lastly, you can check out the relationships between wave patterns in stock prices and astroharmonics that I personally have discovered at the web location- http://gopher.uconn.edu:80/~jpa94001/harmony.html >Please GET OFF this academic list, and peddle this material among those >interested in astrology for its entertainment value, or who are = >interested in believing in far-fetched ideas without any empirical = >basis. Please GET OFF your high horse and start presenting material to back-up your subjective claims. The empirical basis of my ideas is there and, unfortunately, it will probably not be until there is a Grand Supercycle crash, Moscow coup and world war in the wake of last year's (this year's) planetary alignment peak before self-righteous and thoroughly closed-minded academics like yourself bother to even take a look. Lastly, simply because you would like to close yourself off from the case for an astroharmonic explanation of long-wave phenomenon is no reason that everyone else should be closed-off. If you can not deal with what I'm arguing in a reasonable, *scientific* fashion by counter-arguing with *counter-evidence*, then maybe it would be best if *you* remove yourself from this list for scientific discussions and debate on long-wave phenomena. ========================================================================= Date: Thu, 18 Jan 96 11:08:13 EST From: "J. Adams" Subject: Global Bipolar Disorder To: longwave list >>In a message dated 96-01-17 13:17:26 EST, J. Adams writes: >>I believe I have discovered the source of *irrationality* in mass >>expectations, i.e., the totalitarian powers of the West have misled >>Western expectations to an optimistic extreme for the purpose of >>a total upset in the form of a surprise third world war. >and then goes on to say: >>It is the ultimate upset of people's misled high expectations for world >>peace and prosperity by a military onslaught by the authoritarian >>powers of >>the East. >Come now, the "totalitarian powers of the East" plotting against the >"democratic powers of the West" aren't you really just lumping together >historically heterogeneous groups and then reducing much, if not all, of >history into a simple demonistic syllogism? Really, "Them" versus "Us". > Could we be more naive? >J. DeFay Actually, Mr. Defay, as part of a broader theory I associate the "East" with totalitarianism and holistic thinking (e.g., communism and military strategization) in contrast to the West which I associate with radical individualism and analytic thinking (capitalism and strategic naivete). Global western and eastern hemispheres seem to have characteric differences similar to the differentiated characteristics found in the left and right hemispheres of the brain. The following paper explains my view and ties it into longwave phenomenon.